ISO/IEC 27001 ↔ ISO 9001
6 canonical controls in Keel's library satisfy clauses of both ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001. Implement each once, attach the evidence once, and it counts toward each standard. The overlap is the work you don't repeat.
Controls that satisfy both
| Canonical control | ISO/IEC 27001 clauses | ISO 9001 clauses |
|---|---|---|
| Risk assessment & treatment A documented process to identify, analyze, evaluate, and treat information security risks on a defined cadence. | A.5.7 | 6.1 |
| Change management Changes to systems and software are requested, reviewed, tested, approved, and tracked. | A.8.32 | 6.3 |
| Third-party / vendor risk management Due diligence, contractual safeguards, and ongoing monitoring of vendors that handle your data. | A.5.19 | 8.4 |
| Security awareness training Ongoing security awareness training for all personnel, with completion tracking. | A.6.3 | 7.2, 7.3 |
| Document & records control Documented information is created, approved, versioned, and controlled; records are retained and protected. | A.5.37 | 7.5 |
| Internal audit program A risk-based internal audit program evaluates conformity and effectiveness at planned intervals. | A.5.35 | 9.2 |
Clause identifiers (ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001) are referenced factually for mapping. Keel is not affiliated with or endorsed by the bodies that publish these standards. Control descriptions are Keel's own; a framework's full authored control count is on its framework page.
Why this is one project, not two
On a crosswalk-native model, ISO 9001 mostly lights up controls you already built for ISO/IEC 27001. You're not re-uploading the same screenshot for a second audit. You apply the framework and see the genuine delta worth working. That's the whole idea behind collect once, comply everywhere.