ISO 9001 ↔ NIST Cybersecurity Framework
4 canonical controls in Keel's library satisfy clauses of both ISO 9001 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Implement each once, attach the evidence once, and it counts toward each standard. The overlap is the work you don't repeat.
Controls that satisfy both
| Canonical control | ISO 9001 clauses | NIST Cybersecurity Framework clauses |
|---|---|---|
| Risk assessment & treatment A documented process to identify, analyze, evaluate, and treat information security risks on a defined cadence. | 6.1 | ID.RA-01 |
| Change management Changes to systems and software are requested, reviewed, tested, approved, and tracked. | 6.3 | PR.PS-01 |
| Third-party / vendor risk management Due diligence, contractual safeguards, and ongoing monitoring of vendors that handle your data. | 8.4 | GV.SC-01 |
| Security awareness training Ongoing security awareness training for all personnel, with completion tracking. | 7.2, 7.3 | PR.AT-01 |
Clause identifiers (ISO 9001 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework) are referenced factually for mapping. Keel is not affiliated with or endorsed by the bodies that publish these standards. Control descriptions are Keel's own; a framework's full authored control count is on its framework page.
Why this is one project, not two
On a crosswalk-native model, NIST Cybersecurity Framework mostly lights up controls you already built for ISO 9001. You're not re-uploading the same screenshot for a second audit. You apply the framework and see the genuine delta worth working. That's the whole idea behind collect once, comply everywhere.